| E-GIANTS
Dave Klein was the Giants' beat
writer for The Star-Ledger from 1961 to 1995. He is the author of 26 books
and he is one of only four sportswriters to have covered all the Super Bowls.
Dave has allowed TEAM GIANTS to reprint some of his articles. By
DAVE KLEIN
IF JIM FINN REALLY CAN'T MAKE IT BACK,
WHO WILL BE THE GIANTS' FULLBACK? There
is a chance, although it's not formalized and the way things are it probably won't
be until it formally announced that fullback Jim Finn will not be playing for
the Giants any time soon. He has
a shoulder injury, which head coach Tom Coughlin confirmed last Friday, and there
is really no timetable established for a definitive answer to the problem. The
indication is that the Giants must have felt it could mushroom into a problem
since they tried in vain to sign restricted free agent Vonta Leach from Houston,
only to see the Texans surprisingly match the offer, rather high (said to be $5.2
million over four years) for a kid with next to no NFL experience. There
is no other fullback on the roster at the moment, just Finn, the ghost of Leach
and a free agent running back -- described as "a bruiser" -- named Robert Douglas
(6-1, 230, virtually no chance), so this could be a problem when the season opens.
On the other hand, who says a fullback is absolutely, positively necessary? It
isn't exactly a luxury, but there are ways to get around it, and today, on the
eve of the three-day minicamp, why not explore some of them?
First of all, the duties of a fullback are varied, and in the current mode of
pro football they don't usually include running the ball to any great extent.
Rather, the first duty is to be the ever-present blocking back, a job at which
the undersized Finn excels except when he is physically overmatched, and that
has happened more frequently as he gets somewhat older (this will be his eighth
season and he is only six feet tall). His
blocking effectiveness has been more due to his quickness than his power, and
that should be considered a clear and obvious cause for his shoulder injury. Fullbacks
get pounded more often than not; the head-on collision between a fullback and
an inside linebacker, both with four to five yards of a head start, is often horrific.
So the fullback blocks, whether
the running play is inside, up the middle, off guard or wide, on a toss or a slant
outside tackle. He is there. He has to be there. The success of the rush often
depends on him. The fullback also
has clear and definitive job descriptions with respect to pass blocking. He is
there. He has an assignment. He is often the key to a quarterback's health or
a concussion. So what does one
do without a proven, experienced fullback? There should be a capable blocking
tight end nearby, who can drop into the backfield, pin the defensive end on sweeps
and close down the linebacker on inside runs. He would have an advantage of sorts
since tight ends are generally more experienced as pass receivers but less adept
at blocking on the run or pulling out with a running back. The
three-step pass drop might take some of the pressure off the formation without
a true fullback, although if that's the direction the Giants choose, you can almost
bet that most of the time you'll see two tight ends in the game -- the starter
Jeremy Shockey and whoever wins the backup job, which at the moment can be either
Darcy Johnson or impressive fifth-round draft pick Kevin Boss.
But playing the game without a fullback is risky at best; at worst, it can prove
to be hazardous to the health of running backs and quarterbacks.
There is, however, one more consideration. During the off-season, the Giants engineered
a minor trade with Cleveland, in which they surrendered the non-productive wide
receiver Tim Carter in exchange for running back Reuben Droughns. That's a 6-0,
220-pound experienced veteran of eight seasons. Is it possible that with the 6-4,
265-pound Brandon Jacobs on the field as the featured back, with Droughns in the
game as the quasi-fullback and with a second tight end hanging around as well,
the Giants might make it work?
Yeah, it's possible. But two tight ends and two backs on the field would limit
the creativity of the passing game, too.
QUICKLY NOTED -- Former Giants' linebacker Jessie Armstead seems ready to sign
a contract with the Giants so that he can retire as a Giant. ... "It's a perfect
opportunity," he said. "You see guys do it sometimes, like Emmitt Smith did [in
Dallas]. It's something special." ... So was Armstead, absolutely. From
Chris G. -- (The quarterback trade) "That was a very good point your reader brought
to the table. I never looked at it that way, and while Phil was a leader and we
loved him I think a lot of quarterbacks would have done well in that safe system
and with that defense and L.T. on the other side giving you the ball twice a game
extra. Eli is a gentleman as well, which is a breath of fresh air. I have this
sad feeling New York may not be home for a guy like him, and fans have a way of
driving guys out of here. But the reality is I think Philip Rivers gnaws at us
more then Ben Roethlisberger, but not much anyone can do except let the kid settle
down. He is still a kid who is being micro-managed and coached by way too many
people." From Frank G. (The parking
situation) -- "I feel for Mike V.'s frustration; no one is more upset than me
about the parking. I usually entertain 20 to 30 guests at my tailgates and we
all arrive at separate times, etc. I did give the matter some thought and that
cooled my jets. What are they (the Giants) supposed to do? They are building a
new stadium and they need the space for equipment, dirt, space to build, etc.
There is no choice. Also the Giants are just following the other teams' models
with a new stadium and licensing fees for seats, etc. The Eagles did this in Philly
and fans flipped out, yet the stadium is still full every Sunday, just like it
will be filled with Giant fans in the new stadium in East Rutherford. It is a
sign of the times, so get over it. If the Philadelphia market could bear those
financial changes I am quite sure the New York market can bear it. I for one can't
wait to get in there and spend my money watching my beloved Giants. So you go
to one, two or three or games a year, however many you can afford, instead of
all eight. It frees up some family time on the other six Sundays."
Check out Dave's website at E-GIANTS
where you can subscribe to his newsletters which
run much more frequently than what is available here. - Team Giants
NEW
- Send a request to davesklein@aol.com
for a free week's worth of news! |